Truespel - the English Based Phonetic Notation – for ESL

-
Truespel - the English Based Phonetic Notation – for ESL

Truespel phonetic notation was created in 1986 to answer the following question: What would be the best way to design a phonetic notation based on the sounds and most typical spellings of English?  After all, if English is the lingua franca of the world, shouldn't an accessible approach to phonetics (for ESL and EFL learning ) be based on it as well?

As a human factors specialist at the time, I found that pronunciation guides were not standardized nor computer-friendly, not even for copy/paste. Moreover, academic notations such as the International Phonetic Association (IPA) system (often called 'the IPA') were not English or computer- friendly, using a mix of languages and codes (such as exotic symbols) to spell sounds.   Because of this, phonetics is not taught to children in the US, which impacts, for example, the learning of phonemic and phonological awareness, key correlates to reading development and success.  But truespel makes this possible.

To research truespel, I found only one place in the world interested in English phonetic notation, the Simplified Spelling Society, now The Spelling Society.  Various notations were depicted, some very similar to truespel,  the objective being that if English, like Finnish, were spelled consistently, it could be learned more easily, like Finnish, (such as for literacy purposes), in months rather than years.  Yet major reform of English spelling standards is extremely hard to do.

The truespel goal instead was to supply a pronunciation guide to assist readers with pronunciation and phonetic look-ups.  The design rule was to use the most frequent sound spellings, or those that are least conflicting with traditional spelling.  For certain letters or sounds,  this was not easy to do, especially vowels, because there are five vowel letters to spell 17 (or more) vowel sounds in English.  For example, the letter is found in the following words: on, do, of, for, word, motor, and pilot.  In each of these words, however, each instance of the letter stands for a different sound.

Using a scientific approach, I analyzed English, as set down in truespel books 1 and 2, to determine spelling norms for English sounds.  Book 1 is a dictionary list where words are spelled once.  Book 2 is a frequency list of words found in typical text (which counts phonemes/categorical sounds for repeated words).  The analysis verified the reasonableness of the sound spellings of truespel.

The reason these studies were possible was that English was respelled in truespel.  But to do that, a guide for proper pronunciation was needed.  The answer was 'talking' dictionaries.        The ones used largely represent USA English, one of the most widely taught 'standards' because of the US's large population (300 million people) and its economic and political power in the world.  The resulting phonetic spelling is more accurate than any other transcription, because (1) it's recent and (2) all schwa symbols are removed and clarified (in written English, the schwa sound is represented by many different spellings, and not all reduced vowel sounds in English are actually schwa).  Truespel book 3 shows the Voice of American simplified English dictionary with a truespel guide.  This guide includes many typical USA alternative pronunciations that all other dictionaries should include but do not.

In statistical terms, English's writing is overall mostly consistent, especially in the consonants that form the framework of written syllables.  My research shows that for English, 90% of consonants are spelled in the top most frequent way, while only 50% of the vowels are.  Thus, many words need to be sight memorized, and a phonetic guide would be most helpful as to the pronunciation of words.  Truespel provides such a guide, and it's free.  Truespel.com has a free phonetic converter provided by Joe Davison, where text can be pasted and converted to phonetics.  Teachers can create pronunciation lessons that way.  The site also has a web page converter.  Thus, the internet can be converted to truespel using it. Because of the power of computers and internet, truespel is everywhere.

Truespel is simple.  University grad students took only 15 minutes to learn it.  This is because 30 out of 40 phonemes are self-evident.  English-speaking 3rd graders can learn truespel in about an hour.  The beauty of it is that truespel is also capitalization-friendly, punctuation-friendly, copy/paste-friendly, filename-friendly, and spreadsheet-friendly.  No other notation does this.  Usefulness is the key.

Teachers can use truespel to:

1. Show beginning readers the sounds of English to teach phonemic and phonological awareness
2. Show English pronunciation to ESL students.
3. Show pronunciation of words from other languages in truespel  – translation guides.
4. Integrate English reading instruction, pronunciation materials, dictionary pronunciation guides, translation guides, phonemic aptitude tools, and analysis tools.  The future goal is complete integration, which does not exist now.

For a quick tutorial on truespel regarding the 40 sounds of USA English in a simple story see http://tinyurl.com/yh46rgc  and see http://tinyurl.com/yls55da for indicating stress in truespel.

For further information about truespel, contact me at tzurinskas@yahoo.com
Tom Zurinskas, creator of truespel.

Tom Zurinskas, USA - CT20, TN3, NJ33, FL7+
see truespel.com phonetic spelling

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Japanese publishers of EFL textbooks and materials

-
Japanese publishers of EFL textbooks and materials  Charles Jannuzi, University of Fukui, Japan Most 'western' publishers do not actually develop and produce textbooks and materials for the EFL market in Japan. Rather, they produce a lot of generic courses and supplementary material that they label 'communicative' and for 'false beginners' and hope EFL teachers here will adopt and adapt them to their classrooms. There are some problems with this approach to mass market publishing. First, many of the western publishers are not very reliable in providing support to the teachers who use their textbooks. For example, many of these publishers are reluctant to provide free teachers' manuals/answer keys and CDs/DVDs (such as for listening courses). Second, if their books are not in stock with the distributors that university bookstores use, it can be a very long time to get the textbooks--and the prices can be quite inflated. Third, using such materials is a bit
Read more

Implementing Better Multiple Choice for EFL Learning and Testing (a presentation made at IELT-CON 2021 / PELLTA)

-
Image
The conference was done online, and this is the video for my presentation.  https://youtu.be/BiGx_BgE3Fg A video of the presentation, "Implementing Better Multiple Choice for EFL Learning and Testing." by Charles Jannuzi, University of Fukui, Japan This presentation describes and explains procedures and techniques by which teachers can create their own collections of multiple-choice (objective-response) items for language practice and testing for courses. The focus is specifically how to devise and deploy multiple choice questions (MCQ) to enable language practice and testing that are more organic to assigned courses and their designated syllabuses, materials, and classroom content. It is hoped that these explanations and examples will serve, for example, teachers who have to give grades based on objective evaluation to large numbers of students and who do not have time for alternative means (e.g., oral interviews). A couple of notes of correction and clarification: 1.
Read more

Teaching English /r/ and /l/ to EFL learners: a lexical approach (parts 1-3 final)

-
Teaching English /r/ and /l/ to EFL learners: a lexical approach (parts 1-3 final) Charles Jannuzi University of Fukui, Japan Introduction English /r/, /l/ and contrasts across these two categories of sounds are often cited as pronunciation and listening perception problems for a variety of EFL learners, most from E. Asia. The language backgrounds most often associated with these problems are Japanese, Korean, Chinese and some languages of SE Asia (e.g., Thai but also Cantonese Chinese). Other language speakers have also expressed an interest in improving their pronunciation of English /r/ and /l/, including Russian and German EFL learners. Perhaps the most well-known group to have a problem with the two categories of sounds is Japanese EFL learners. This could be because their native language background creates the most difficult problems to overcome, both in terms of listening perception and spoken production. It could also be because Japan attained affluence b
Read more